Academic achievement at school or
university is the only true measure of a person's intelligence. To what extent
do you agree with this statement?
Intelligence is the ability to solve problems efficiently.
Researchers have found that smart people are able to adapt their skills to deal
with common troubles in both personal and professional lives. However, academic
situations such as schools encourage people to put the spotlight on being able
to adapt to specific structures and show their abilities into these. The question
is what happen with people who are different or have difficulties to get used
to? Are they not smart enough?
Brilliant people can use their intellectual capabilities
to make their lives more satisfactory. I strongly support the idea that it is
impossible to measure this ability through school scores. The real way to
evaluate this point is making a comparison between people desires and their
lifestyle. For example, a person who wants to have kids and turn them into good
people, and achieve this feeling glad, this is a person who is able to manage
situations well enough, from my point of view he or she is a very smart one.
On the other hand, academic requirements ask for a
specific kind of intelligence which is the skill to manage many demands into a specific structure. So, society
life is full of structures. That is why I believe that having good marks at
school shows one kind of intelligence. However, there are lot of smart and
creative people who are not able to reach those. They are not stupid people,
they have just other skills.
In conclusion, I definitely think that academic achievements
just check one kind of abilities; nevertheless, intelligence is much more than
that. In my opinion, what define intelligence is how well people can go over
the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment