Improvements in health, education and
trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the
government of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the
poorer nations in such areas.
To what extent do you agree or
disagree with this point?
277 words, 33 minutes (after self corrections)
Around the world are big difference between developed
world and poor countries; however the essential keys of improve the last once
are working in health, education and trade. It is possible that with help from
richer nations, developing countries could reach better life conditions; but I
am not sure there is an easy answer, and it is necessary to think deeply about
it before giving an opinion.
Countries with high standard of living could have a
chance to offer some tools and support to countries which are below the poverty
line in order to encourage better health facilities, higher literacy rates and
good wages for people. This kind of help would be a great input for the whole
world.
On the other hand, it is common that the poverty in countries
is not related to lake of resources or help; on the contrary, most of
developing nations have lots of natural richness and they tend to make bad
decisions at the moment to manage them. To make things worse, they are used to
feeling the government of wealthy nations as nemesis of them.
From my point of view, every case is different and
even if countries with better standard of living have more opportunities to
help others nations, it is not their obligation. I am not expert, but I believe
that it depends on each specific country and its interests.
In conclusion, though the world conduction is a responsibility
of all (rich and poor) each country should be able to look for better ways to
improve their people lifestyle, and only in some case when nations have a clear
intention, the developed world have to help others.
No comments:
Post a Comment