Air traffic is increasingly leading to
more noise, pollution and airport construction. One reason for this is the
growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destination.
Some people say that government should
try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily.
Do you agree or disagree?
268 words, 31 minutes (after self corrections)
There is an interesting debate whether governments
should increase air tickets taxes in order to reduce the amount of passengers
who use airplanes to travel in both holidays and work, because the great rise
of air traffic is generating lots of environmental problems. Some people
support the idea that it cannot be the solution. It is a complicated issue
which deserves a deep evaluation before offering an opinion.
In the last 20 years air traffic has greatly raise as
well as its consequences, such as pollution noises and many natural changes. It
is necessary to control this trouble before having more hazardous situations.
One idea to face it has been increase the tickets cost; so that less people can
buy them, and they would avoid some air travels which can be done using other
transportation ways like bus or boat. This approach might has a direct impact
on these problems and solve wide range of them.
On the other hand, other group of people believes that
common people must not pay for those consequences and world leaders should look
for different solutions to think out this trouble, such as deny using no environmental
friendly aircraft or force companies to develop new more efficient machines
which carry fewer problems on environment.
In conclusion, from my point of view, the easiest
solution for those problems would be increase taxes on fly tickets, but it is
not a good answer for them, because people ought not to be charged with the
whole trouble, it may be more useful that governments look for global solutions
forcing companies to offer more environmental service.
No comments:
Post a Comment